Ok I am no expert on the economy, so this
observation can be viewed as just my take on how I perceive it to
The economy is a closed system, although
wealth can be generated it can only be within certain confines, in
other words, if we all won the lottery tomorrow and therefore we all
became rich, then who would do the work?
So the economy is an illusion, it is not
really about money, it is about control of the masses, so who
controls this illusion or should I say this invisible proverbial
whip, cracking at all are backs?
The chief Illusionists
Chancellor of the Exchequer,
The Federal Reserve,
there are many more, but that's enough for now.
Do you feel under economic pressure, don't
worry, your supposed to.
I often wonder, just how stupid we must all
be, to allow ourselves to be manipulated in this way.
You see the way I see it, is like this, the
more wealth the system or the masses generate, the more the system
has in terms of investment potential. So every bit of wealth created
adds to the collective whole. The system can not afford to give the
masses back the wealth they generate as such, because the fear is,
if it did, then the poor would then be able to use this wealth, thus
enabling them to break free of the perpetual slog that is the
average job. They in effect need you to live from wage packet to
wage packet, or even better, to be in dept
to the system, as I said, it is just a form of control at the end of
the day. The trap.
The problem is, that although the economy
currently works, it works by investment, the more wealth created the
more investment can take place, and more investment, usually means
more jobs. More jobs usually means more social control and more
wealth as such being generated, this in essence,
is a self perpetuating loop, the economy is now global and
has grown into the global economy because of this. The economy or
should I say this system, now in effect controls everybody.
Ok now for the problem,
investment is now leading to increased I.T. development and
although this is leading to wealth at some levels being generated,
it will ultimately lead, I believe, to many more jobs being lost.
Keep in mind that it won't cost much to produce a virtual worker, no
more effort than clicking the copy button, although it may take some
effort to initially produce this new workforce, once realised, we
should ALL be able to benefit from the wealth these things will be
capable of generating for us, but only if introduced into a
different type of economic system.
powers that be, I believe, are still clinging to what I call the
old ideology, in other words, you create wealth by getting everybody
to work, so helping build the future, as I said the problem is, that
in an A.I. / nanotech future, then this ideology or should I say the
economy, is going to run straight smack into the problems
highlighted throughout this ebook. I just hope the public see the
issues raised here before the chain reaction takes a real hold, even
though it is already beginning to show itself.
The global economic down turn seen in the last few years is I
believe the first real rumblings of the problems I have highlighted
throughout this ebook, and I do believe it will get worse, unless we
are willing to change the economy. The economy is also based on
supply and demand,
if a A.I. can provide a cheaper workforce and nanotech can
produce cheap goods, then the first law of economics, dictates that
society will eventually and inevitably have no choice, but to
change. The education system and almost all aspects of so called
normal life, will be impacted by this technology. There is no point
in educating the masses how to become trained chimps for industry,
when industry no longer has any bloody use for them?
What I believe should be done now, is to use
the wealth created, not to create more
meaningless jobs, but to
alleviate the financial pressure that most of the poor seem to be
under. So when rich people start to accumulate an individual wealth
of many billions, then that wealth should be taken off them and then
redistributed in a new way, i.e. giving this generated wealth
directly back to the poor. So no more messing about, investing in
government work creation
schemes etc, just give it directly to the people who produced it
in the first place. I can see a few eyebrows being raised at this,
but if the chain reaction is tackled in the old fashioned sense,
then it will lead to an even greater disaster. If advanced software
and hardware can pass exams etc and start to do most jobs, then it
makes sense at least to me, to let the machines do most of the work,
thus allowing us ALL to benefit. New economic
tools will have to be created so as to combat the potential problems
highlighted. If we get it right, then some of the problems currently
seen within some labour markets, could surely be offset, but in a
good way, by a virtual / robotic workforces, rather than all of the
negative ways, pointed out.
At present investors and the
public are being tapped, loans being made, dept being run up, so as
to build the new e-commerce highways of the future. Highways of
flickering light, with billions of bits of information, being
instantly flashed around the Earth, a global infrastructure being
built and funded by the masses, but, WHO
ultimately will benefit ....will it be us....
or will it be the machines?
They say, the new e-economy may
devastate the old economy, if true, then once again,
WHO will benefit?
This is the point - WHO benefits.
I say, no more rich, no more poor, just an
equal sharing of the wealth, that for the first time ever, the human
race does not have to create for itself, and in thus way, we could
AT THE END OF THE DAY
THIS IS ABOUT
Ideology a dictionary
1. visionary theorizing
2 a : a systematic body of concepts especially about
human life or culture b : a manner or the content of
thinking characteristic of an individual, group, or culture c : the integrated assertions, theories and aims that
constitute a sociopolitical program.
President Bushes ideology -
this had most of congress applauding.
PRESIDENT BUSH'S STATE OF THE UNION ADDRESS,
Our first goal is clear: We must have an economy that grows fast
enough to employ every man and woman who seeks a job.
After recession, terrorist attacks, corporate scandals, and stock
market declines, our economy is recovering. Yet it's not growing
fast enough, or strongly enough. With unemployment rising, our
nation needs more small businesses to open, more companies to invest
and expand, more employers to put up the sign that says, ''Help
Jobs are created when the economy grows; the economy grows when
Americans have more money to spend and invest...............etc.
ABOVE IS THEIR IDEOLOGY
THIS EBOOK IS ULTIMATELY
ABOUT WHAT THEIR IDEOLOGY COULD LEAD TO
THIS BEING THE POINT OF THIS EBOOK, IF YOU
HADN'T ALREADY GUESSED.
IF WE KEEP BELIEVING IN THE
IDEOLOGY OF RICH AND POOR, BECAUSE AFTER ALL, THAT'S ALL IT IS, THEN
EQUALITY FOR US ALL, WILL NEVER BE ATTAINABLE, WHICH HAS TO BE
JUST REMEMBER IF WE ARE ALL
EQUAL, THEN WHO LOSES....IS IT THE POOR?
AND AFTER ALL THERE ARE MORE
POOR THAN RICH.
WE CAN'T CHANGE THE IMPACT
THIS TECHNOLOGY WILL HAVE ON SOCIETY, UNLESS WE ARE PREPARED TO
CHANGE THE ECONOMY OR SHOULD I SAY, THE IDEOLOGY.
WE EITHER WISE UP OR THE CHAIN REACTION COULD
ENGULF US ALL.
SOME OF THE NEW TECHNOLOGIES
WE ARE INVENTING, CAN NOT BE INTRODUCED INTO A SOCIETY THAT IS
WILLING TO USE THE ECONOMIC TOOLS WE CURRENTLY HAVE.
THERE'S NO POINT LOOKING
KEYNES OR OTHERS IN LIGHT OF WHAT IS BOUND TO HAPPEN, IF WE
DON'T CHANGE THE IDEOLOGY, THIS IS SOMETHING NEW AND IT WILL TAKE
NEW THINKING TO GET US THROUGH IT.
IF WE DON'T LEARN TO SHARE THE WORLDS RESOURCES
EQUALLY, THEN WE WILL EVENTUALLY, LIKE SO
MANY TIMES IN THE PAST, KILL EACH OTHER AND GO TO WAR
OVER IDEOLOGY / RESOURCES / MONEY ETC, PLUS THE ILLUSION THAT IS
SOME ECONOMIES ARE AN
ILLUSION SO AS TO MANIPULATE THE MASSES, AS I SAID, THIS IS NOT
ABOUT MONEY, THIS IS ABOUT IDEOLOGY.
A JOB FOR EVERYBODY MAY
SOUND GOOD, UNTIL YOU REALISE THAT NOT EVERYBODY WANTS A
WHICH MOST JOBS ARE, SO THE PEOPLE WHO DON'T WANT TO BE DOING
SOMETHING MEANINGLESS WITH THEIR LIVES, WILL BE TREATED LIKE
I USED TO THINK LIKE MOST
PEOPLE, I.E. WHAT'S WRONG WITH THAT IDEOLOGY, I MEAN EVERYBODY
WORKING SOUNDS OK, BUT IF YOU HAVE TRULY UNDERSTOOD THIS EBOOK, THEN
YOU SHOULD START TO QUESTION, NOT ONLY WHO IT IS YOU MAYBE WORKING
FOR AND WHAT TYPE OF SYSTEM YOU ARE PAYING INTO, BUT WHAT TYPE OF
FUTURE YOU ARE WORKING TOWARDS.
NO MORE RICH - NO MORE POOR
- IF THEY WANT YOU TO WORK, THEN DEMAND EQUALITY, WHICH AFTER ALL,
IS WHAT MOST GOVERNMENTS SAY THEY WANT FOR US ALL.
AND THEN REALISE
THAT YOU ALSO HAVE THE
RIGHT, TO DEMAND FROM THE
DEMANDERS, THE SAME THINGS, THEY HAVE DEMANDED FROM YOU,
SEE HOW FAR YOU GET?
HOW WE TREAT EACH OTHER, CAN NOT BE BASED ON
MONEY, BECAUSE IN MY OPINION, IT IS EASY TO MAKE MONEY, IF YOUR RUTHLESS
THIS ALSO GOES FOR
HOW THE POWERS THAT BE,
THINK THE MASSES SHOULD BE TREATED, ARE THE MASSES
TO BE TREATED AS NOTHING MORE, THAN IGNORANT EASILY
MANIPULATED FOOLS OR ARE WE TO BE TREATED AS EQUALS?
JUST REMEMBER, IN A
DEMOCRACY, IT'S YOUR CHOICE OR IS IT?
IF THE CHAIN REACTION
OCCURS, THEN IT WILL BE THE FAULT OF US ALL
STRCZYNSKI PUTS IT
THIS IS ABOUT - ORDER vs
THE OLDEST IIDEOLOGY
THERE IS, HORUS
THAT BE ARE TRYING TO PREVENT CHAOS, THEN I BELIEVE THEY ARE
GOING ABOUT IT THE WRONG WAY
WHAT DO YOU THINK?
PERSONALLY I THINK,
CAPITALISM IS A PSYCHOPATHIC NIGHTMARE THAT WE SHOULD ALL WISE
STRUCTURES IN GENERAL ARE LED BY PEOPLE....PEOPLE ARE?
WE WON THE COLD WAR / WE WON
GULF WAR 2 - WESTERN IDEOLOGY HAS WON, BUT SHOULD WE REALLY TRY
IMPLEMENTING IT GLOBALLY, IF THIS IS THE STRATEGY, THEN I HOPE TO
GOD THE PEOPLE AT THE TOP HAVE FACTORED IN ALL OF THE PROBLEMS I
HAVE POINTED OUT.
WHAT THE HUMAN RACE NEEDS TO
DO NOW, IS WISE UP,
6000 YEARS OF MONEY
MONEY IS AN IDEOLOGY.
EQUALS 6000 YEARS OF
INEQUALITY, THAT'S WHY WE HAVE SO MANY PROBLEMS.
SO WORK IT OUT, WE HAVE HAD
6000 YEARS TO PERFECT THIS IDEOLOGY AND IT STILL DOESN'T WORK, AT
LEAST NOT EQUALLY AND IT NEVER WILL.
SO WE SHOULD ALL WORK
TOWARDS CHANGING THE IDEOLOGY, OR WE COULD ALL BECOME VICTIMS OF
THE CHAIN REACTION.
WHAT THE PEOPLE AT THE TOP
SHOULD ASK THEMSELVES IS THIS, WILL SMART MACHINES RESPECT THEIR
POWER, MONEY OR THEIR IDEOLOGIES OR WILL SMART MACHINES SEE THESE
THINGS AS JUST HUMAN BASED ILLUSIONS?
OF THE CORPORATION